I am still uncertain if i would see a marked improvement between a superzoom compact and a superzoom bridge camera, I am considering something like a Panasonic lumix FZ45 or FZ48, but I am also looking at a Panasonic TZ18 or TZ20.
The lens specs and overall camera specs are very similar, so why do people go for the bridge cameras?
Any comments are appreciated.
What Are Advantage Of A Bridge Camera Over A Superzoom Compact?
Started by The Scotsman, Feb 06 2012 02:20 PM
2 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 16 February 2012 - 12:54 PM
It's a question I wonder often. If you're getting a bridge camera with a 18X to 23X zoom, I can't see the point. If however you get one with a 30X plus telephoto, the advantages speek for themeselves; more shooting range, less need for cropping later. That's a about it as far as I can tell.
#3
Posted 12 March 2013 - 12:54 AM
QUOTE (Bee Jay @ Feb 16 2012, 04:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's a question I wonder often. If you're getting a bridge camera with a 18X to 23X zoom, I can't see the point. If however you get one with a 30X plus telephoto, the advantages speek for themeselves; more shooting range, less need for cropping later. That's a about it as far as I can tell.
A big plus for me buying a bridge (FZ200) vs. a compact superzoom was the viewfinder. In many lighting conditions, a screen becomes very difficult to see/use. Other advantages are the (arguably) greater number of modes (Aperture/Shutter priority, manual, bracketing etc.) available to me. Add in the ability to screw a filter onto the lens.
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










