Rating System (that Old Chestnut!)
Posted 27 June 2006 - 07:37 PM
Stripping things down to base level, all I want to do is take better pictures. I know this is not a professional organisation and that we are not all professional photographers and that everything we say doesnt come from a photography textbook. What we share when we comment on each others pictures is a learning through experience and through truth; well it should mean that, and thats where I feel the current problem lies.
I suppose after all that there should be some point or suggestion for a solution. However, I suppose the solution is nothing to do with changing the the rating system itself as there is nothing really wrong with it in itself. But I do feel that one way to try would be to narrow the spectrum and reduce the scoring system to a 5 point scale instead of a ten. Do we really need so many points between good and excellent? On the scale, 6 is slightly above good, yet we all feel disappointed if we get a 6. I think it would be far better if rating was only out of 5. 1=below average, 2=average, 3=good, 4=very good, 5=excellent.
At the end of the day the 5 could become the new 10 and we would be back to square one, but less choice leads to a tighter marking scale and I think it would make it easier to rate. The purpose of this site is for us to be able to help each other through praise and constuctive critisism with the goal of improving our ability in something we love doing, namely taking photographs. If you are here for another reason then there is nothing more I can say.
Visit My Website
Posted 06 July 2006 - 04:46 PM
I agree, if I get a 6 on a photograph then it's above average but needs improving. If i get a 10, which I have on other sites, it means my photo is the best photo anybody has ever seen. To which I would be kidding myself if I believed that.
It would be good to see a site where the users would vote on allot more photos, but truthfully. Possibly the only way to do that would be to limit the amount of 10's & 9's a user can give a month. Now I know that would be difficult to do in a phpbb based site, due to lack of code, but never the less it would be refreshing.
Anyway, thatís my 10 pence worth.
Have a nice day!
Posted 06 July 2006 - 07:24 PM
Gone are the days when there was good photographers on here,who you could learn from.
Now all it seems to be is "pat on the back" photographers who seem to put average photo,s on.but still get high rateings.
Hence Mark i no longer wish to upgrade my account.
Posted 09 July 2006 - 10:56 PM
I'd like to say I registered with this site with good expectations and within a week I have found it lame. 5Mb of free space, is that a joke?
For extra info on this topic go here. http://www.photograp...?showtopic=1138
Posted 10 July 2006 - 02:24 PM
Very few people will give anything below an 8 for a while now.
I believe it is more productive for us all to have a realistic rating system. The problem with so many high ratings, as I see it, is that it leaves no margin for the really exceptional images and really what is getting between 8 and 10 now should probably be spread out from 5 to 10.
It's rather dificult sometimes though, as you don't want to discourage people. If the system is consistant though I think it would be fine to use lower ratings where appropriate.
Always a tricky issue though.
Posted 13 July 2006 - 07:00 AM
I, for one,. have stopped posting because the ratings have been ridiculous for quite some time. It seems to me that certiain people are using the site to have little get togethers and smooth each other's egos .. more like a chat room than a photography site. They're throwing 9's and 10's around with gay abandon. It's unbelievably discouraging for anyone who is trying to be serious and to have constructive criticism. As a for instance this post http://www.photograp...o...=500&page=1
was rated as a 9. I'm not criticising the poster of the (?) photo, but I can't believe that ahyone could rate this so highly.
Thoroughly p***ed off and bored, bored, BORED!
Posted 13 July 2006 - 09:08 AM
We might be upgrading the Gallery software soon, so I'll have a look and see what we can do...
Posted 13 July 2006 - 01:17 PM
There are other images on the blog I feel are worthy of a 9/10 and I will give that image a 9/10, what I like is not going to be to other peoples tastes, but if I give it a high rating, that is my opinion of which I am fully entitled to, just as others are to theirs. If I see an image I would want on my wall at home, that means I must like it, no matter the quality, whether they've followed all the photography rules and critieria, it is down to personal taste.
As for the image above DP anyone can see it was meant to be a little bit of fun, it made me smile, I didn't rate it, but I commented. I don't think Amanda posted the image thinking this is going to be a top image and will be rated accordingly, she posted it for fun.
SCRAP THE RATING SYSTEM until at least someone can come up with an answer to make it better, I always thought this blog was friendly and informative, not an overtop, stuffy follow the rules photo site, it is meant to be for fun as well, not just for photo critique.
Posted 14 July 2006 - 01:02 PM
Take care all Jogi
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users