Canon Lens
Started by mad-donna, Aug 20 2007 04:28 PM
11 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 20 August 2007 - 04:28 PM
Hi,
I'm on the lookout for a telephoto zoom for my 400d, mainly to be used for wildlife shots.I have narrowed it down to three that are within my price range, they are as follows: Canon EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM, the Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO and the Tamron 28-300mm f3.5-6.3 XR Di LD
The Canon is really out of my price range but if the photo quality well exceeds the other two I would have to consider it.
Any advice as to which one I should go for would be much appreciated.
Thank you in advance
Donna
I'm on the lookout for a telephoto zoom for my 400d, mainly to be used for wildlife shots.I have narrowed it down to three that are within my price range, they are as follows: Canon EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM, the Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO and the Tamron 28-300mm f3.5-6.3 XR Di LD
The Canon is really out of my price range but if the photo quality well exceeds the other two I would have to consider it.
Any advice as to which one I should go for would be much appreciated.
Thank you in advance
Donna
#2
Posted 21 August 2007 - 05:49 PM
I'd go for the Canon lens if you can afford it. Ignore the Tamron superzoom, as it will offer poorer quality than the two dedicated telephoto lenses.
Mark Goldstein
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
#3
Posted 21 August 2007 - 07:50 PM
QUOTE (mad-donna @ Aug 20 2007, 05:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi,
I'm on the lookout for a telephoto zoom for my 400d, mainly to be used for wildlife shots.I have narrowed it down to three that are within my price range, they are as follows: Canon EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM, the Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO and the Tamron 28-300mm f3.5-6.3 XR Di LD
The Canon is really out of my price range but if the photo quality well exceeds the other two I would have to consider it.
Any advice as to which one I should go for would be much appreciated.
Thank you in advance
Donna
I'm on the lookout for a telephoto zoom for my 400d, mainly to be used for wildlife shots.I have narrowed it down to three that are within my price range, they are as follows: Canon EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM, the Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO and the Tamron 28-300mm f3.5-6.3 XR Di LD
The Canon is really out of my price range but if the photo quality well exceeds the other two I would have to consider it.
Any advice as to which one I should go for would be much appreciated.
Thank you in advance
Donna
[size=5]hi i'm no expert but i agree, go for the canon, but like you i went for the sigma because the canon was out of my price range. but i'm very happy with the sigma, go for it Paul............
#4
Posted 21 August 2007 - 07:57 PM
Many thanks for the replies, it's much appreciated
Donna
Donna
#5
Posted 03 September 2007 - 08:44 PM
When I got my first dslr a couple of years back, a Canon 350D, I bought the Tamron 28-300mm f3.5-6.3 XR Di LD with it. Yes, if I had had more money I would have bought a Canon 70-200 L or a Canon DO 70-300mm. But at the time it was all I could afford (sob sob)!
I have since upgraded to the 30D and although I have bought a Canon L lens (17-40), I have stuck by my Tamron as I feel it takes excellent quality pics. Many of the shots in my gallery are taken with it and I have never had any problems with it. Obviously, If money was not an option I would change it for an L series zoom like the 100-400mm, but alas I dont have a spare grand lying around. For a couple of hundred quid, I have found this lense to be great value for money.
Cheers
Richard
I have since upgraded to the 30D and although I have bought a Canon L lens (17-40), I have stuck by my Tamron as I feel it takes excellent quality pics. Many of the shots in my gallery are taken with it and I have never had any problems with it. Obviously, If money was not an option I would change it for an L series zoom like the 100-400mm, but alas I dont have a spare grand lying around. For a couple of hundred quid, I have found this lense to be great value for money.
Cheers
Richard
#6
Posted 03 September 2007 - 09:31 PM
It's amazing how many people put down the Tamron 28/300!,,,,,I'm a pentax man so I dont have much option for the price I can afford!........I have the 28/300 and I find it excellent value for money!...and with a bit of time and effort you can turn out some creditable shots!........from portraits to little birdy's!...lol..........It gets my vote anyway.....................
If I see something I "SHOOT!"
#7
Posted 04 September 2007 - 02:55 PM
Up to the point when it packed up I'd always been happy with the results I'd got from my Tamron 28-300 lens far too many people seem to treat this lens as a joke. Unfortunately the cost of repairing it was more than it was worth so sadly I no longer have the use of an extremely versatile unit...... Tony
#8
Posted 22 September 2007 - 09:53 PM
mad-donna,
I agree.... go for the Canon. I have that lens and LOVE IT! The IS is terrific. I bought a Sigma lens on my last trip to Hong Kong and have been disappointed. I should have picked up another Canon. If you can afford a bit more you will not be disappointed.
Cheers,
Red Lantern
http://www.redlanternstyle.com
I agree.... go for the Canon. I have that lens and LOVE IT! The IS is terrific. I bought a Sigma lens on my last trip to Hong Kong and have been disappointed. I should have picked up another Canon. If you can afford a bit more you will not be disappointed.
Cheers,
Red Lantern
http://www.redlanternstyle.com
#10
Posted 17 October 2007 - 05:21 AM
I eventually opted for the Canon, I am quite happy with the lens, however I do agree with Fidgety at the 300mm end the shots are not as sharp as I would like. I've tried using a tripod but they still appear quite soft....I think this is a common problem with any lenses within this price range.
I'm saving up for the Canon 100-400mm L lens....it might take a while though, they are so expensive!
Donna
I'm saving up for the Canon 100-400mm L lens....it might take a while though, they are so expensive!
Donna
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











