10d Vs. 20d ?
Started by MrGabb, Feb 24 2005 12:40 PM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 24 February 2005 - 12:40 PM
I am trying to make a decision on whether I should upgrade to the new (to me) 20D or stick with my 10D. The difference in pixels is nice but not compelling. I was wondering if anyone could tell me of the practical advantages to upgrading. I shoot weddings and special events and get good results with what I have. How much of a cost benefit is there to upgrading?
Thanks
Thanks
#2
Posted 24 February 2005 - 01:23 PM
I tried out the 20D at the PMA show yesterday, along with the 10-22mm EF-S lens and battery grip. The things that struck me were the rapid 5 fps and the angle of view that the lens gave - these factors may be enough to persuade me to upgrade, as I miss the wide-angle.
I also tried out the new Digital Rebel XT, but it felt completely alien to use coming from the 10D. That alone would put me off buying one.
I also tried out the new Digital Rebel XT, but it felt completely alien to use coming from the 10D. That alone would put me off buying one.
Mark Goldstein
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
#3
Posted 24 February 2005 - 01:26 PM
Only you can answer this one! Does the 20d offer a feature not available on the 10d that you must have to significantly improve your photography? I would guess not. I wouldn't have thought that the 20d was enough of a step change from the 10d to justify the expense. The alternative, if you can afford it, is have both for the convenience of taking two bodies on assignment - one with a wide angle zoom and one with telephoto. Saves lens swapping.
#4
Posted 24 February 2005 - 03:13 PM
Thanks for the replies guys, I would like you to clarify something for me. Does the fact that the EF-S lenses that can be used with the 20D are "closer" to the sensor mean that they give a more normal angle of view? And if so what is the different crop factor for these lenses other than 1.6?
#5
Posted 24 February 2005 - 03:18 PM
The crop factor is related to the sensor size, which is the same in both cameras, so the crop factor is still 1.6x.
Mark Goldstein
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
#7
Posted 25 February 2005 - 05:14 PM
That lens is one of the main reasons for me considering an upgrade to the 20D...but then Tamron have just released a 1118lens and Sigma a 10-20mm one. Hopefully they will offer comparable quality to the Canon lens.
Mark Goldstein
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
#8
Guest_Guest_*
Posted 26 February 2005 - 02:44 AM
I can't speak for the EF-S lenses but Canons "L" lenses can't be beat. There is only one lense that I know of that rivals the clarity of an "L" lense and that's Tamron's 28 - 75 f/2.8 XR DI. It only costs $400 compared to Canons equivalent $1100. The clarity and sharpness are absolutely superb.
#9
Posted 06 March 2005 - 05:23 PM
When is the best time to buy I have in the last month purchased a 20D after using a second hand EOS650. I find the 20D very nice to handle.Results are very good. The top of the range Mk2 at £4000 is a little out of my reach. I handled the 300D in a shop today and its not a patch on the 20d
#10
Posted 06 March 2005 - 06:58 PM
Canon have just released the 350D, which is the replacement for the older 300D. Specs are good but it's a more consumer orientated camera than the 20D.
Mark Goldstein
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
#11
Posted 01 April 2005 - 12:06 AM
The 20D is very nice but my friend who has used both doesn't find a very significant difference in the case of upgrading. The 5FPS burst is nice if you shoot a lot of action. I've heard you can get a respectable trade in on the 10D. Don't know if that's true. I love the 20D and if I were buying new I'd go with the 20D again. But if you already have a 10D and are familiar with it and love it maybe hold off for a bit. The way upgrades are going the 20D will be overshadowed in not too long by something better and even cheaper. Such is technology.
Karma
Karma
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










