Hi forum members,
I'm going on my first trip to Vietnam on May 20th, 2004 and I currently have the DRebel with the kit lens (18-55mm). I know the lens is perfectily fine for my skill level and needs, but I want a better lens, with more zoom for taking photos in Vietnam.
I'm on a strict budget so I've narrowed it down to two lenses. The Canon 28-135 and the 75-300mm, both with IS and USM. They're currently priced at $749 and $799 respectively at the local shops in Calgary, Canada.
Can I get some feedback on the performance of these lenses? or any suggestions on alternatives within the same price range. Thanks in advance.
Which Lens For My Trip To Vietnam?
Started by Lagerstatten, Mar 03 2004 08:44 PM
8 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 04 March 2004 - 05:00 PM
If the kit lens is fine, I would be inclined to go for the 75-300mm lens. This will then cover 18-300mm focal length, with a small gap in the middle. You may want to consider the Canon 70-200mm f/4 L lens, which doesn't have image stablisation but offers greater image quality (I have one and you really can notice the difference).
Mark Goldstein
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
#4
Posted 05 March 2004 - 09:59 AM
How about a 2nd-hand 70-200mm f/4 L lens then? That's how I bought mine - £450 for a mint 2nd-hand example versus £400 for a new 75-300mm IS. I know which one I'd rather have!
Have a look at this album for some examples of what the 70-200mm f/4 L can do - everything except for the wide-angle shots:
http://markgoldstein...gallery/album68
Have a look at this album for some examples of what the 70-200mm f/4 L can do - everything except for the wide-angle shots:
http://markgoldstein...gallery/album68
Mark Goldstein
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
Editor, PhotographyBLOG
#6
Posted 08 March 2004 - 06:37 AM
Thanx for all the replies. On one hand, I should go with the 75-300 for the extended reach and broader coverage of the spectrum, but with the 28-135 I won't have to change my lenses that much.
I called around town looking for a used F4 70-200mm L series and couldn't find any. Ebay did come up with some results, but I don't really trust buying a lens through the net. Well, if one shows up before May, I'll take a look at it and consider it as a purchase.
Thanx.
I called around town looking for a used F4 70-200mm L series and couldn't find any. Ebay did come up with some results, but I don't really trust buying a lens through the net. Well, if one shows up before May, I'll take a look at it and consider it as a purchase.
Thanx.
#7
Guest_Guest_Jonchilds_*
Posted 31 March 2004 - 01:18 AM
Personally I'd be taking the 28-135mm lens with my 300d if i went on a trip. 28-135 will cover the 45-215mm range in 35mm equivalent, which is plenty, and I find that my 75-300mm II lens is good, but realistically I dont think that 120-480mm focal lenghts will be needed unless you plan on doing lots of telephoto shots.
I also find that gap between 55 and 75mm annoying as i need to change lenses to get that slightly higher level of zoom, and 28-135 wouldnt need me to be changing lenses anywhere near as often.
I also find that gap between 55 and 75mm annoying as i need to change lenses to get that slightly higher level of zoom, and 28-135 wouldnt need me to be changing lenses anywhere near as often.
#8
Posted 07 April 2004 - 12:49 AM
Just purchased the 28-135mm IS USM lens. Haven't taken any photos with it yet, but I will soon. Thanks for all the advice. Also, I got the lens for really really cheap. Only $450 Canadian, it's used, but it's less than a month old. Checked the lens out and it was flawless, not a scratch or dust anywhere. Guess the owner didn't like it (or didn't know how to use it?).
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











