Home Register · Login 

Search

Recent Photos
1 day  7 days  14 days


Statistics
Users 21,145
Photos 75,755
Comments 269,062
Views 164,668,605

Top Posters
ripper 4408
fungus2 2318
phototoad 1389
Bridget 1243
Amandart 1087


Latest News

 
» Home » Photo of the Week (CLOSED) » 2005 » ExposureManager Photo of the Week: 2005 : June 6th - 12th Slide Show


prev
Middle of a Poppy
next


Middle of a Poppy




<<
2385inl_lk_lr21.jpg
3198Lake_of_Tranquility.jpg
919poppy.jpg
919orchid.jpg
3347owl.jpg
>>

snaphappy



See all User Photos

Registered: March 2004
Posts: 943
  • Pin It
7.5
Date: Mon June 6, 2005
Views: 2,075
Filesize: 94.3kb
Dimensions: 372 x 357
Keywords: middle of poppy
Show EXIF Info




daydreamer
Very nice shot. Didn't know the inside of a poppy looked like this.
#1 Mon June 6, 2005 9:48pm

Badger
#2 Tue June 7, 2005 2:27pm

daydreamer
Badger, if you see this, would you mind to tell me the reasons for your 5 rating? I'm not suggesting it isn't appropriate; I'm just wondering what you see (or know) that I don't see (or know). If this question is out of line, please excuse it.
#3 Wed June 8, 2005 11:11pm

Badger
Well, I gave it a five, which is "Good". To my mind that is what it is. Compositionally it is lacking as is the amount of detail visible. I would like to see lots of detail for a record-type shot or some interesting composition for a more artful and appealing pictorial shot. Normally I do not mark shots that do not catch my eye, but as this was at the top of the pile with its ten mark I just couldn't leave it there with so many better shots in the gallery, many unmarked.
#4 Thu June 9, 2005 7:48am

daydreamer
Thank you for answering, Badger. I see where our points of view diverge. To me, this is a very detailed and utterly original photo. I had never seen anything like it before. Coupled with the design provided by nature, I thought it was wonderful. Since you mention its lack of detail, I am guessing that you have seen this type of photo before (maybe even done a number of them yourself) and know that the detail isn't there. That's the kind of thing I don't know, but I'm slowly learning. Thank you again.


And since you mentioned it, I've noticed that many beautiful photos go unremarked here. Often, my comment is the only one. I have assumed that it is just a matter of taste. But I will admit, I have wondered.


Snaphappy, thanks for letting us use your space to discuss this. I still think this is a great photo.
#5 Thu June 9, 2005 5:53pm




Photo Sharing Gallery by PhotoPost
Copyright © 2012 All Enthusiast, Inc.

No portion of this page, text, images or code, may be copied, reproduced, published or distributed in any medium without the expressed written permission of the copyright holder.

© Copyright 2003-2013 Photo 360 Limited