Home Register · Login 

Search

Recent Photos
1 day  7 days  14 days


Statistics
Users 21,092
Photos 75,722
Comments 269,050
Views 163,901,634

Top Posters
ripper 4408
fungus2 2285
phototoad 1389
Bridget 1243
Amandart 1087


Latest News

 
» Home » Photo of the Week (CLOSED) » 2004 » Photo of the Week: 2004 : April 12th-18th Slide Show


prev
gecko - DOF 2.1mm
next


gecko - DOF 2.1mm



Macro photo of a small gecko, with a calculated DOF of 2.1mm.


<<
959Fleur1.jpg
816isla14.jpg
778gecko_2mm.jpg
1040Monarch.JPG
237SandyFeet.jpg
>>

julesnap

See all User Photos

Registered: February 2004
Posts: 11
  • Pin It
6.5
Date: Wed April 14, 2004
Views: 3,852
Photo Tags: 1
Filesize: 48.9kb
Dimensions: 400 x 590
Keywords: gecko macro




seeham
#1 Wed April 14, 2004 12:51pm

nynavey
I like the black and white aspect of this gecko shot, but I do wish more of him, or all of him, were as sharp as his eyes...or more gradual perhaps.
Nynavae
#2 Wed April 14, 2004 1:46pm

Kurt
I would have liked to have his nose in focus as well as his eyes, but intiguing photo nonetheless. I do find the copyright distracting though, is it really needed?
#3 Wed April 14, 2004 2:47pm

Jools
I like the abstract nature of this one, caused by the extremely small depth of field. The viewers attention is focused well on the eyes. I also like the use of the lighting and black and white image, coupled with the unusual composition. The result is something that's very different. Good effort.
#4 Wed April 14, 2004 5:51pm

julesnap
Thanks for the comments. I have seen many photos of subjects where the whole subject was in focus (which also would have been a LOT easier!), the object of this photo was only to have a very small DOF. I would have prefered both eyes being 100% sharp, but it was tricky to get even one eye in the correct plane. The copyright is just a hangover from a copy sent elsewhere, I just uploaded the same photo here.
#5 Thu April 15, 2004 7:12am

Neddy
#6 Thu April 15, 2004 11:22am

Allan
#7 Sat April 17, 2004 5:11am

potto
This keeps popping up in random images and every time I have to look, it's so original and definately interesting. I love it I'd like to give it a 10 but am sure I would be slated by everybody as it is not technically traditional. It certainly has the 'it' factor tho.
#8 Fri April 29, 2005 8:34pm




Photo Sharing Gallery by PhotoPost
Copyright © 2012 All Enthusiast, Inc.

No portion of this page, text, images or code, may be copied, reproduced, published or distributed in any medium without the expressed written permission of the copyright holder.

© Copyright 2003-2013 Photo 360 Limited