Home Register · Login 

Search

Recent Photos
1 day  7 days  14 days


Statistics
Users 21,145
Photos 75,755
Comments 269,062
Views 164,676,068

Top Posters
ripper 4408
fungus2 2318
phototoad 1389
Bridget 1243
Amandart 1087


Latest News

 
» Home » Post Your Photos » Black & White Slide Show


prev
Black & White Stonehenge
next

View Larger Image


Black & White Stonehenge



Cropped out the grass, sharpened and slight curve adjustment, now b&w. Have upped the contrast slightly.


<<
3459Holdenhurst_Village_Church_2_B_W.jpg
3459Hob_b_w.jpg
3459SHBW.jpg
3459Jazz2.jpg
3298On_the_Rocks.jpg
>>

gazmaster



See all User Photos

Registered: July 2005
Location: m
Posts: 2,610
  • Pin It
8.5
Date: Tue August 16, 2005
Views: 3,424
Filesize: 19.2kb, 22.6kb
Dimensions: 600 x 299
Keywords: stonehenge witlshire monument





Yup! Def works better for me in b&w. I think its about right, the smoother tones remind me more of Ilford XP-2 film, which I loved. You could try a more contrasty shot, but this is a nice natural shot and looks more realistic. It's very moody and does all the better for it. The right side horizon rising also helps as a dead level one gets boring. Nice one, I think you could do some seriously hot stuff in b&w keep experimenting! Stonehenge has been photographed to death, but this is more than able to hold its own.
#1 Tue August 16, 2005 11:27am

gazmaster
Nice one Barry, appreciate your comments and advice, certainly does have a different feel to it now thanks to you Smile
Regards

G@zz@
#2 Tue August 16, 2005 2:16pm

bailbr
I like this as a BW it definately adds mood. IMO if your going to go BW you should do so behind the camera and capture the tones and contrast that way
instead of converting. It seems so hard to jump to BW when I'm at a place I love to photograph I always want to go color. I just think the camera will do better than the PS conversion. I like your image both ways.
#3 Tue August 16, 2005 5:08pm

daydreamer
Like them both, but this one seems to suit the age of the monument, shrouded in clouds and mystery. Nice shot.
#4 Tue August 16, 2005 5:34pm

frog
Well said daydreamer I agree.
#5 Tue August 16, 2005 5:59pm

gazmaster
Bailbr you have a valid opinion there, I have had the opinion that the camera should do the bw work, as I feel the depths of blacks and greys should be deeper, I am certainly not overly happy at converting the original. I will have to have a go I think at both options. The only good thing with regard converting the original is at least there is a colour one to go back to Smile
Regards

G@zz@
#6 Tue August 16, 2005 6:31pm

gazmaster
Many thanks to you both DD and Frog for your comments and ratings Smile
Regards

G@zz@
#7 Tue August 16, 2005 6:32pm


A tough one to call with the b&w thing. I have shot and converted a lot of pics, but I also shot some in b&w! Hard to know which way to go as i could see little difference in quality. I would suggest using the contrast adjustment, clarify (most handy), brightness to tweak it until happy. I like shooting in b&w although you have to think more about tone & composition, maybe a good thing. But then sometimes I wish I has taken colour so as not to miss out! Try a few sample shot using both col+b&w and playing with the vivid/natural option!
#8 Tue August 16, 2005 6:39pm

gazmaster
Definitely is a tough call, I do have some pics that I soley shot in bw so will check them out later. Must admit when I shoot in bw, 9 times out of 10 it looks superb on the camera Lcd and Sh*te at home on the pc. Still it's all good fun and at least unlike film, no money is wasted practicing. Will also check out the vivid/nat options, looks like some severe reading ahead Smile
Regards

G@zz@
#9 Tue August 16, 2005 6:45pm

donmac
Very nice but I think it would benefit from more contrast too. As far as shoot b/w or colour debate, if you are using a digital camera then it is simply using internal processing to convert. But there is no better processing tool than photoshop. Have you tried adjusting the levels and curves? If you dont have photoshop you can download a free processing tool called GIMPshop (just search on the net for it ). Its very good.
#10 Tue August 16, 2005 7:34pm

gazmaster
Many thanks Donmac appreciated, have just touched up the photo by adjusting the contrast slightly, didn't touch the brightness. Hopefully this is nearer the finished article. If not and anybody else has advice, I will be grateful.
Regards

G@zz@
#11 Tue August 16, 2005 10:30pm

aderixon
A great minimalist shot of the stones, almost a portrait. As regards B/W, you can always make a better conversion than the camera manually in PS, mainly because having the separate RGB information gives you more options for tonal balance. Search the net for some suggested techniques. That said, this shot is fine.
#12 Mon October 3, 2005 7:56am

gazmaster
Many thanks Ade, appreciate your comments and advice..
Regards

G@zz@
#13 Sun October 9, 2005 2:03pm




Photo Sharing Gallery by PhotoPost
Copyright © 2012 All Enthusiast, Inc.

No portion of this page, text, images or code, may be copied, reproduced, published or distributed in any medium without the expressed written permission of the copyright holder.

© Copyright 2003-2013 Photo 360 Limited