I think it's an equisite exhibit of architectural photography. I've given up mentioning the trouble with building copyrights on the blog, but since you're into selling stock, I'll re-mention it in this case. There really are some buildings you can't sell without paying first. I was shocked to learn that Seattle demands payment for shots of the Space Needle. You don't have to pay when it's part of a cityscape, but if it's the primary object of interest, you have to pay.--Chris
Your right Chris. It is a shady subject. If the property is privately owned you need a property release to sell the image as stock. I do not have a property release for this image and would never dare to sell this image as stock or sell this image even for editorial use. For any one wanting to sell any of their images, model releases or property releases are a must! This image is just for pure love of photography:) Thanks for the comment Chris.
Great B&W'There is no point pressing the shutter unless you are making some caustic comment on the incongruities of life. That is what photography is all about. It is the only reason for doing it.'......Philip Jones Griffiths