Home Register · Login 


Recent Photos
1 day  7 days  14 days

Users 21,359
Photos 75,890
Comments 268,616
Views 169,656,053

Top Posters
ripper 4408
fungus2 2394
phototoad 1389
Bridget 1243
Amandart 1089

Latest News

» Home » Member Galleries » photocat Slide Show

reach for the sun

reach for the sun



See all User Photos

Registered: July 2008
Location: f
Posts: 4,758
  • Pin It
Date: Sun October 18, 2009
Views: 1,651
Filesize: 234.6kb
Dimensions: 533 x 800
Keywords: reach for sun
Show EXIF Info

New camera, Cat? Doesn't matter. Your photos have never been dependent upon your equipment, but upon your photographer's eye, as this one is.

#1 Sun October 18, 2009 6:12am

donna apsey
Beautiful shot Cat Thumbs Up!
#2 Sun October 18, 2009 7:17am

Now this is a great photo. You did itagain Cat. Wink
#3 Sun October 18, 2009 12:01pm

wonderful backlight
Freelance creative, happiest when i'm taking or painting pictures

My Website

My Flickr pages

My Gallery
#4 Sun October 18, 2009 1:18pm

So many beautiful flower images today....this is wonderful too Cat!......nice composition, love the soft light......great work Cat!....SmileAlan
#5 Mon October 19, 2009 12:52am

Hi, Chris, and thank you for your lovely comments and I am honoured that you think I have an 'eye'. It means a lot. I have learned a lot from your helpful criticisms in the pastSmile Yes, new camera, an early Christmas present that I accidentally opened - oopsWink Not sure about it, yet. Not much time to play. I do know my 1D mklll rocks, although, I am quite attached to my little xti, also. Are you concerned about the pixel-pushing going on, same size sensors - more pixels? I suppose the photocytes are larger? Anyway, thank youSmileCat
It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see ~ Henry David Thoreau
#6 Mon October 19, 2009 4:17am

Thank you, so much, Donna, Chuck, Jason & Alan (how are you?) I very much appreciate your commentsSmileCat
It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see ~ Henry David Thoreau
#7 Mon October 19, 2009 4:19am

I'm concerned that while Canon brings the technology forward, getting continuously better results from smaller pixels, Nikon seems to be stuck at 12mp and just re-hashing old cameras with a slapped-on movie function or something. It's like back when they refused to put sensor cleaning technology in the cameras, but they were eventually forced into it by the market. In the meantime, Canon is pushing out wondrous machines like the 7D.

#8 Mon October 19, 2009 1:50pm

So simple and so perfect - its not the pixels that count its the photographers seeing eye.
#9 Mon October 19, 2009 8:16pm

Thank you, mortong, and I agree about the pixels and equipment. Cat
It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see ~ Henry David Thoreau
#10 Tue October 20, 2009 5:25am

I agree that megapixel hunt isn't the way to go just based on that goal. Cat has proven a thousand times with her wonderful XTi photos that you don't need 24mp to create an artistic beauty. My point in bringing up the differences in the camera companies is that the scientific effort to improve the technology eventually benefits us all.

#11 Tue October 20, 2009 5:38am

#12 Fri December 14, 2012 7:25pm

Photo Sharing Gallery by PhotoPost
Copyright © 2012 All Enthusiast, Inc.

No portion of this page, text, images or code, may be copied, reproduced, published or distributed in any medium without the expressed written permission of the copyright holder.

© Copyright 2003-2013 Photo 360 Limited