Gary’s Parries 09/04/06

April 9, 2006 | Mark Goldstein | Gary's Parries | 12 Comments |

Gary's ParriesThis week’s Gary’s Parries topics are:

1. Birds Of A Tether
2. Not So Black And White
3. Mr. Mac And Ms. Windows To Wed

Introducing this week’s Gary’s Parries column. Everything you always wanted to know about digital cameras, but were afraid to ask. No question too difficult, or too easy. As a Senior Principal Software Engineer, and a former Assistant Professor of Computer Information Systems, as well as a recording studio owner/operator, and now, a digital camera enthusiast, GARY has more digital camera knowledge in his entire brain than most people have in their little finger. In the unlikely event that GARY would not know the answer to your question, he will answer it anyway, true to the spirit of the word “Parries”, a fencing term which, in this context, implies “cleverly evasive answers”. So let your imagination run wild. Email all your nagging digital camera questions to: garysparries@photographyblog.com, and then, En Garde!

You may also attach to your email an ORIGINAL PHOTO of your choosing. A preview of the photo will be displayed with your question, and a full-sized version will be just a click away, for viewing and downloading (unless you request otherwise). No personal information will be published with your question unless you specifically include it in the text or attached photo of your email. Questions and photos selected for publication may be further edited for grammar, content, or other reasons.

Here are this week’s questions and answers

*** QUESTION 1—- BIRDS OF A TETHER

Gary's ParriesHey Gary’s Parries ...

I am poised to buy a digital SLR for the first time. I am an old film SLR guy who has used a handful of point-n-shoot digitals over the last five or six years, only because it was needed at work, and because I am a techie at heart. I have always waited on them and bitched about their lenses, but now I am going to jump in with either the Nikon D200 or the Canon 30D. I will probably go with the Canon, but I am still having a “first lens” debate, as I realize now that this body will send me down a long path of either Canon or Nikon lenses.

My question has to do with combining either of these two bodies with a laptop in an “art-copy” setup. I can’t find a sales person that is savvy enough to predict whether the Nikon or Canon has any better features that would allow me to shoot with remote shutter for an inaccessibly positioned digital body, and then preview the image on a laptop in real-time so I can model the shot before a series of final frames are taken.

Just stopped into a Ritz where they plugged a Nikon D50 into the video port of a TV they had behind the counter. The Nikon took a frame, disabled the on-camera LCD, and displayed the image on the TV. When MENU was selected at the camera, the settings displayed 100% on the TV. So the TV was acting as the camera’s LCD, which was disabled while the TV was connected. The sales guy reminded me that this was the Nikon’s video (not USB) port, and was not sure what the Canon’s equivalent features would be, nor whether a laptop display would allow a similar process. The TV image was of very poor quality, as I recall.

The USB connection moves data to the PC (image files), and the video port sends LCD display info out? What about typical laptop ports? I must go read my users manual.

Any advice about gear I should be looking for, starting with the two digital bodies?

Thanks,
Greg

P.S. I have attached a sketch of the proposed copy station setup. This is something I would build onto an existing, adjustable drawing board top, and could quickly make it ready to record process photos.


*** ANSWER 1 ***

Greg, excellent sketch, but the required setup is really much simpler than what you have shown. You can eliminate the camera’s remote control completely, as well as the video cable from the camera’s video output to the laptop’s video input (assuming your laptop even has a video input). All you really need is a computer controlled DSLR that tethers to your laptop with a standard USB or FireWire cable, and which allows complete control of the camera and preview of its images on the computer screen, all via the camera’s included, optional, or third party software.

If you are into Nikon (and that is really your choice), the D200, D70s, D50, and D2X (among others) all provide computer remote control using the optional Nikon Capture Camera Control software application (List: $139.99, Mac and Windows).

http://nikonimaging.com/global/products/software/capture4/

If you are into Canon (and again, that is really your choice), the EOS 30D, 5D, and 350D (among others) all provide computer remote control using the included Canon Remote Capture software application (Mac and Windows), or using the highly rated, DSLR Remote Pro software application ($95, Windows only) from Breeze Systems.

http://www.breezesys.com/DSLRRemotePro/index.htm

One note regarding the preview of images on the computer. As you know, aside from the new Olympus E-330 and Panasonic Lumix DSC-L1, DSLRs are incapable of live preview from their main CCD. With the above mentioned remote control software, preview is accomplished by the triggering of the camera’s shutter from the computer, and then transferring the resulting (unstored) image directly to the computer via the USB or FireWire connection for immediate display on the computer screen.

If you really want or need a “live” preview, there is another option available, namely, the PS Remote software application ($45, Windows only) from Breeze Systems, which allows remote control of a long list of Canon PowerShot digital cameras (i.e., non-DSLRs), while providing a live viewfinder display on the computer via the USB tether. The Canon PowerShot cameras supported are the S3 IS, A620, S80, G6, and Pro1 (among many, many others).

http://www.breezesys.com/PSRemote/index.htm

Greg, I would recommend that you download all the free trial versions of all the above mentioned computer remote control programs, check them out thoroughly, and then use that as a basis for deciding which brand of camera you would want, and whether you would want a DSLR with a “real-time” preview, or a digicam with a “live” preview.

*** QUESTION 2—- NOT SO BLACK AND WHITE

Gary's ParriesHi Gary,

I have a problem for which you might have an answer ... or maybe not!

The problem is with printing grey scale images. Depending on the manufacturer’s paper, I get a colour cast, i.e., green using Fuji paper and pinkish using Epson paper, with this cast being more evident in the darker areas.

Is there a way around this problem, or is there paper especially designed for printing monocolour images?

Hoping you can help.

Ken M.

P.S. I get the same result using the Epson R300 and the HP 3210 printers.

[Note: the accompanying “B&W” photo was provided by Nick in Japan - Ed.]


*** ANSWER 2 ***

Ken, there are a number of factors that influence the quality of black-and-white photos from color inkjet printers, including: (1) the processing used to convert a color image to black-and-white; (2) the type of paper used for printing; and (3) the type of ink used for printing. With the problem you are experiencing, I would say the type of ink you are using is the main culprit.

There are many printers that have special photo-gray ink cartridges which can be used to produce neutral, yet rich and vibrant, gray scale images. Unfortunately, neither your Epson R300 nor your HP 3210 provide this capability; however, short of buying a new printer, there is a work around.

For your Epson R300, you can buy third-party, monochrome ink sets to replace your color ink cartridges for printing in black-and-white. When you print with these inks, you actually leave the printer in its “color” print mode, rather than “black-and-white”, since the color mode will mix the monochrome inks (just like it does color inks) to achieve a higher depth of tone than would be possible in the black-and-white printer mode using a single cartridge.

Here is a site which sells monochrome inks for an Epson R200/R220 (which I believe uses the same cartridges as your R300, but better make sure before buying).

http://www.inksupply.com/utr2.cfm

Two different types of monochrome ink sets are shown, one for warm prints, the other for neutral prints. A set consists of seven ink cartridges @ $10.95 each. There are two blacks inks, one for glossy paper, the other for matte paper, either one of which replaces your normal black ink cartridge, and there are five other monochrome inks which replace your five normal color ink cartridges.

When switching back and forth between the different ink sets, particularly between the monochrome and color ink sets, be sure to completely purge the printer of the previous ink before printing with the new ink.

*** TOPIC 3—- MR. MAC AND MS. WINDOWS TO WED

Gary's ParriesIt made the PhotographyBLOG “This Week’s Highlights” (see Apple Boot Camp), but not one single comment was posted about it. Maybe you don’t realize that this is the first time in history that the Macintosh and Windows operating systems have been able to run, in native mode, on a single, mainstream platform. Or, maybe you just don’t care.

I’m not sure whether this move was designed, by Steve Jobs, more to attract Windows users to the Mac, or more to dissuade Mac users from drifting over to Windows, but if anyone objects to this marriage, speak now, or forever hold your peace.


***
[Column photo “The Photographer” by Brenda LaFleur of Brenda LaFleur Photography.]



Tracker Pixel for Entry

Your Comments

12 Comments | Newest Oldest First | Post a Comment

#1 nick in japan

Thanks Gary for thinking enough of my picture use it, I should have told you the height and width of the image, my wife is 5'8" not 3'8" tall! Then again, you did brief us on sizes to be submitted, gomenapoopoo!

12:24 pm - Sunday, April 9, 2006

#2 nick in japan

Thoughts on #1... A few years ago, I wired my Sony F707 to a portable DVD player, a simple small jacked, coiled wire, so that a prospective model could watch, live, exactly what I was seeing on the screen. I was able to walk her thru the model shoot , a great teaching aid. She was able to follow me close enough so that we could talk the whole time.

12:36 pm - Sunday, April 9, 2006

#3 Gary's Parries

Nick, I don't know what happened to your photo when it got reduced. I'll ask
Mark to check into it. It looked great full-sized, and the reduction should not
have changed the proportions.

Interesting idea in comment #2.

12:45 pm - Sunday, April 9, 2006

#4 Mark Goldstein

Nick, your wife has been restored to her natural height :)

1:04 pm - Sunday, April 9, 2006

#5 nick in japan

You guys work well together, super! Thanks! Just like Delbert teaching John how to play the harmonica!

1:31 pm - Sunday, April 9, 2006

#6 Gary's Parries

Nick, the image must have been damaged in my transport to Mark; however,
Mark, being the resourceful person that he is, was able to project the image
onto his wall, and calculate the proper projected width of the photo from the
focal length setting of the lens, as supplied in the EXIF data of the image. He
was then able to adjust the height of the image using Photoshop, a ruler, and
your wife's true height of 5'8" (as supplied by you), until the projected height
matched her true height.

BTW, 5'8" is pretty tall, but we could make her even taller if you'd like? :)

11:37 pm - Sunday, April 9, 2006

#7 nick in japan

She is tall for a Japanese, on the other hand, my previous wife, #2 is 4'10" tall, she was delighted to learn that she qualified for the "Midgets of America" group. I sent that picture in hopes to bait you into a response, asking what those wrappings were on that multi-trunked Pine!

12:53 am - Monday, April 10, 2006

#8 Gary's Parries

I thought you were trying to bait me with the picture of one of last week's
Gary's Parries pictures, but with the effect that was applied reversed, so I
missed the one with the wrappings on the Pine tree.

5:53 am - Monday, April 10, 2006

#9 tushar

gary,

i am in process of buying a digital slr. so far i have been using point and shoot canon compact camera.

i wanted you to advise me which one to choose as i find it very confusing.


tushar

6:16 am - Monday, April 10, 2006

#10 Gary's Parries

Tushar, it is not that easy. In order to give you advice that would be
of any use to you, I need to know how you intend to use the camera.

1. What type of shooting do you want to do?
2. What model Canon compact do you now own?
3. What do you like about that Canon compact?
4. What don't you like about that Canon compact?
5. Why are you upgrading to a digital SLR?
6. What price range are you considering?

You do not have to answer all these questions specifically; however
the more information you provide, the more I can help you.

8:36 am - Monday, April 10, 2006

#11 Mark Goldstein

(Posted on behalf of Tushar)

dear gary,

i am at present using canon sd500
i am happy with the clarity of photos taken indoors and portraits and which does not need more zooming.
i want slr because i also want to shoot outdoors where i find constraint of zoom specially.
i also feel constrained when i want to shoot fast with my compact.
i am thinking of a camera which would be around 1000 $.

i hope this would help you to guide me.

tushar

6:12 pm - Tuesday, April 11, 2006

#12 Gary's Parries

Tushar, it sounds like your camera needs are not too demanding, so
I would advise that you buy one of the lower end, quality DSLRs, and
then put the money saved towards the purchase of a better lens than
the kit lens normally included with the camera. If you can buy just the
camera body, without a kit lens, and then purchase a lens separately,
that would be ideal.

There are several highly rated DSLRs that come to mind (shown from
lowest priced to highest priced):

1. Nikon D50
2. Canon EOS 350D
3. Nikon D70s
4. Canon EOS 20D

I would suggest checking out all these cameras at your local camera
shop to see how they look and feel to you. The good news is they are
all about a year old, so you should be able to get some great deals.

Hope that makes things a little easier for you. Good luck with whatever
you decide.

9:41 pm - Tuesday, April 11, 2006