Canon IXUS 240 HS
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS
Nikon D800
Samsung DV300F
Olympus OM-D E-M5
Nikon Coolpix P510
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ30
Nikon Coolpix S9300
Olympus E-620 Photos
World exclusive! We’ve published 41 sample photos taken with a production version of the brand new Olympus E-620 DSLR camera. There are 27 full-size JPEG images at the best quality setting, an ISO sequence from 100-3200, and 8 images shot with some of the new Art Filters. The Olympus E-620 is the world’s smallest and lightest DSLR camera with built-in image stabilisation. An Olympus UK spokesman hinted at a possible UK launch price for the E-620 of £650 with a kit lens (US price already confirmed as $699 body-only).
Website: Olympus E-620 Photos
Canon IXUS 240 HS Review
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS Review
Nikon D800 Review
Samsung DV300F Review
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Review
Nikon Coolpix P510
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ30
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
Fujifilm X-Pro1
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
#1 Giovanni
What about the reddish dot in the top-right area visible in almost every photo?
2:02 pm - Friday, March 6, 2009
#2 Roelof
I downloaded a few pictures, because downloading in full resolution takes quite a while. My first comment: I am not excited about the quality. Even with Iso 100 there is a remarkable amount of noise. I don't know which settings are used, because with the E400 en E500 series it's better to turn off the noisefilter or set it to low. When the noisefilter is indeed turned off then the E620 will definately not be my next DSLR
4:04 pm - Friday, March 6, 2009
#3 kelsci
The pics show a great range of colors. I believe that this camera is capable of taking sharp pictures; essentially the pictures are sharp. I felt that details of objects were very well picked up by the lens and pick-up of this camera. The "noisiness" that others may comment may just be inherent of the way pictures come out on Photography Blog. I have seen pictures vary on their test looks on different websites from the same camera model.
4:39 pm - Friday, March 6, 2009
#4 last
but what ISO?? no description below photos :-(
11:12 pm - Friday, March 6, 2009
#5 Roelof
in the article is written that the same photo is made in a range for 100-3200 ISO. When you import the pictures for instance in Picasa you can see that from left to right the following ISO values are used: 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 and 3200.
8:24 am - Saturday, March 7, 2009
#6 Akshay Parshetty
Very Good results even at mid ISO settings and features comparing to its competitors.
6:56 pm - Saturday, March 7, 2009
#7 SM
DO you have Auto Gradation on? There seems to be a lot of noise in the shadows even at ISOs I would expect it at...
11:48 pm - Saturday, March 7, 2009
#8 Joseph
From what I see (I've just looked at 2 samples) and without further information about the camera settings but considering that the pictures have not been post-processed, it looks quite convincing to me. Colour and sharpness are good from scratch and seem to require minimal PP. Dynamic range seems good too if I look at the picture with the orange building which usually is a very tricky situation to obtain proper exposure of all areas. Thanks for the samples !
2:23 pm - Monday, March 9, 2009
#9 Dennis
I would set noise filter low. Sharpness at zero, Contrast down one, and Saturation up one. At 200 ISO those shots would come alive. I only looked at 3 shots. Downloads are slow. I wouldn't mine the 620. I presently have the 510. Off hand, I don't see the need for the artsy filters. More focal points a big plus
11:54 am - Tuesday, March 10, 2009
#10 Ringo
"The "noisiness" that others may comment may just be inherent of the way pictures come out on Photography Blog" - what?
For me there's way too much chroma noise, even at ISO 320 - look at the first picture.
1:23 pm - Tuesday, March 10, 2009