Olympus E-P1
A prototype of the professional Olympus E-P1 DSLR was shown for the first time today at Photokina 2006. Although very much a mockup with few details, the Olympus E-P1 model does at least show the general direction that Olympus are heading in with their professional DSLR line-up. The “E-P1” part is apparently just the internal development name, this will probably change to the E3 (to be confirmed)...








#1 Dario
It looks like it was made out of cookie dough and black shoe polish.
Very disappointing, really.
6:37 pm - Monday, September 25, 2006
#2 Derek
Looks really horrible , and it is so so huge , isn't it?
How big and heavy is it?
8:20 pm - Monday, September 25, 2006
#3 Mark Goldstein
We weren't allowed to touch it - even getting the glass case off proved quite difficult!
8:37 pm - Monday, September 25, 2006
#4 Nicholas
To me, combined with Fuji's S5 staying at 6 MP, Samsung cloning Pentax (and A100 if you look closly), and Canon only upgrading the Rebel, not touching the semi-pro/pro level cameras ( yet), all I can think is that everyone is staying on the side lines as Sigma makes a very big wave with a 'fantastic' camera. It is only my guess.
We will see very soon.
10:40 pm - Monday, September 25, 2006
#5 Derek
So nobody knows how heavy it is yet.
Ok , looks like the design itself scare me a way from it .
I think E400 looks so nice like old-school kind of odd design , what is it ? OM?
I think in 1970 , Olympus released a cool film camera and I expect them to design D-SLR's the same design concept line as the film model .
To be honest , I would like to buy a Range Finder from Lica , but it is a dream , never be materialized .
Any way , I am waiting any one make a cam look cool like the old Lica or Olympus, then I will be more than glad to compromise many tech short comings ..... design is important .
The Canon Eos XTI looks horrible but takes some great pics even at 1600 ISO, but I will never buy or even think of getting it cause of the shitty design (like a toy).
Fuji is not making the body themselves for its flag ship model S5 pro , is it based on Nikon D200? If so , it is so so embarrassing.
Ok , thanks a lot for your great report from Germany.........No new Zeiss?
11:21 am - Tuesday, September 26, 2006
#6 Hokum
My God its ugly, why couldnt they just stick to the E10/20/1 body, the E-1 is quite possibly the best SLR body i have EVER used, and i've used almost all Dslr's!
I think a refined E-1 with a 10mp sensor would be awesome, esp if they can get it to do 5fps and give it better AF-C.
This E-P1 looks like the pff spring of an E-1 and the EOS-3 horrible!
6:34 am - Wednesday, September 27, 2006
#7 Zoltán
Whoaa, Darth Vader's camera!
That explains why there is no mode dial and AF mode switch on it. This is a camera you control with the Force...
I hope the portrait grip is detachable.
11:25 am - Thursday, September 28, 2006
#8 Thomas
In contrast to the other comments, I absolutely love the design. Finally a DSLR camera from Olympus that looks good, clean, modern and purposeful. In contrast, especially their initial designs (look at the old E-1) were really horrible. So let's keep fingers crossed it will perform as well as it looks.
1:29 am - Friday, February 23, 2007
#9 CARL HAMILTON
THIS BABY IS ABSOLUTELY BEAUTIFUL. GO AND BUILD IT , OLYMPUS !
2:49 am - Wednesday, March 7, 2007
#10 CARL
and Olympus , during the actual production of this gorgeous babe , please do not deviate much from the original shape of the prototype which is downright sexy and well put together . otherwise , you would end up like Porsche who diluted the aesthetic values of its production Boxster from the original shape penned by Grant Larsen.
2:57 am - Wednesday, March 7, 2007
#11 Kevin
Since when did the look of the camera become important? That's something that I NEVER understood. Also, all you idiots talking about the size... have you ever handled a Canon 1D? That's the size of the whole damn thing. This Olympus looks like it will be able to have the portrait/extra battery holder removable. All I can say is at least Olympus uses quality materials, where as Canon (like someone mentioned) feels cheap and flimsy (exception: 1D).
10:12 pm - Sunday, September 16, 2007