« Back to news

OpenRAW Survey

Mark Goldstein | Websites | March 10, 2006 | 6 Comments

OpenRAW SurveyUpdate: Due to an overwhelming response, with 18,000 replies so far, the OpenRAW Survey will now close on March 15th, 2006.

OpenRAW Press Release

RAW Survey launched: An International Study of the Experiences, Requirements, Preferences, and Concerns of Photographers regarding RAW Imaging Technology

On January 31, 2006, the OpenRAW initiative launched an international survey on its Web site ( http://openraw.org/survey/ ) to collect information about the experiences, requirements, preferences, and concerns of digital photographers and other interested parties regarding RAW imaging technology, a concept that many writers are comparing to a “digital negative”.

RAW Technology Issues
As the digital properties of RAW image files have become better understood, many digital photographers have embraced RAW technology as the best means to obtain maximum image quality for themselves and their clients. However, during the past year many photographers, photo archivists, and others involved in digital imaging have become concerned about the absence of a robust, common standard for RAW image file formats. Faced with a proliferation of proprietary RAW format, often different for each successive camera model from each camera manufacturer, imaging professionals and devoted amateurs have experienced significant disruptions in their digital image workflow and limitations in their choice of software tools.

This expansion of the sheer number of proprietary RAW formats and the adoption by camera manufacturers of the practice of encryption to conceal information stored in RAW image files have increased fears about the viability of RAW formats for the long term archiving of photographic material. Some manufacturers whose cameras produced proprietary RAW files have already gone out of business, with unknown consequences for future access to those images. Many photographers are concerned that RAW files from current camera models may not be accessible in the future when those models are discontinued.

Why a Survey?
Although these topics are being discussed in many photography forums, we have very little systematic information about the experiences, requirements, preferences, and concerns of photographers regarding RAW imaging technology. One thing is clear, many photographers and archivists believe that camera manufacturers are making important decisions about RAW image technology with little or no input from the people who buy and use their equipment or who are involved in the preservation of photographic works. The OpenRAW survey will give photographers and other interested parties an opportunity to have a voice in the further development of RAW imaging technology.

The online survey questionnaire will be available for eight weeks beginning on January 31, 2006. The date was chosen to coincide closely with the 168th anniversary of an address by William Henry Fox Talbot to the Royal Society of London in 1839 describing a process of “photogenic drawing” (the collotype) based on a paper “negative” that would permit unlimited copies of an image to be made.

We encourage everybody with an interest in RAW image formats to visit the OpenRAW website at http://openraw.org/survey/ and to complete the survey questionnaire, which will take approximately 10-15 minutes. All responses will be kept completely anonymous and confidential. The OpenRAW organization and survey have no connection with any business or commercial interest. The purpose of the survey is to give professional and amateur photographers a means to express their requirements, preferences, and concerns which will be made available to camera manufacturers, software development firms, and other key participants in the digital imaging industry.

Results of the survey will be reported at the OpenRAW Web page. We believe good decisions by the digital photography industry should take account of the needs, requirements, and preferences of the photographers who make their living or pursue their artistic vision through this medium. We will share the survey results widely in the hope that the future of the craft will benefit.

For more information please visit the OpenRAW web site:
http://www.OpenRAW.org

The OpenRAW survey sponsors: Juergen Specht, photographer and founder of the OpenRAW initiative

Calvin Jones, statistical research consultant



 

Your Comments

6 Comments so far | Newest Oldest first | Post a comment

#1 Rob

An universal standard in regard to RAW image format is of utmost importance to ALL photographers, regardless of their status. Everybody should get involved in pressing camera manufacturers to adopt the universal DNG format.

8:40 am - Sunday, February 5, 2006

#2 GARY POGODA

Here's the thing. Despite the obvious advantages of adopting that
DaNG universal RAW format, there is one important disadvantage,
namely, it will hinder the development of better RAW formats. Add
to that the fact that it would take a good hacker less than 24 hours
to devise a conversion program from one RAW format to any other,
and I am not sure the benefits outweigh the disadvantage.

4:18 am - Monday, February 6, 2006

#3 Rob

I don't think it would hinder anything, except short-term advantages to those manufacturers who decide to secretly develop their own software. In the long run - only going with the standard can keep them alive.

As to hackers tinkering with propriatary code - I don't think you are serious... or, you think I am not serious? Do you really think that pro photographers would want anything to do with that kind of home-made solutions? smile

4:45 am - Monday, February 6, 2006

#4 GARY POGODA

No, Rob, I was not suggesting that pros should tinker with homemade
solutions. My point was that users of proprietary RAW formats should
not worry so much about the company going out of business, and not
supporting that format any longer, since such proprietary formats can
be easily reverse engineered (as is already done with numerous RAW
conversion software programs from reputable companies).

The one feature of RAW that I think needs improving, and more so for
consumer cameras than professional, is lossless compression in order
to reduce the time required for in-camera handling of RAW images.

6:03 am - Monday, February 6, 2006

#5 Rob

Oh, OK. I can understand your point...

I still think, though, that the universal standard is a better way to go. Think about all the incompatibilities between Internet browsers and other software. Without the efforts of W3C to bring standards to the web, we all (users of the Internet) would still fight a hopeless war with proprietary code and proprietary features. Thankfuly, there's less and less of that nonsense and the Internet is more accessible to more people. Same pertains to ANY set of standards in a civilized world.

7:14 am - Tuesday, February 7, 2006

#6 GARY POGODA

Just because standardization works in one area, does not mean that
it would work in another; however, in this case, I would tend to agree
with you.

4:53 pm - Tuesday, February 7, 2006

WIN! I'm a caption. WIN! I'm a caption. Win a Sony VAIO Laptop!
Pixmania Logo

Discover a wide range of digital cameras at low prices. Buy cheap cameras from Sony and Canon. Share your photos thanks to digital photo frames.