Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1
Canon IXUS 240 HS
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS
Nikon D800
Samsung DV300F
Nikon Coolpix P510
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ30
Nikon Coolpix S9300
Olympus OM-D E-M5
Sony A100 Review at CameraLabs
CameraLabs have just reviewed the new 10.2 megapixel Sony A100 DSLR camera.
“There’s no denying Sony’s Alpha DSLR-A100 is an impressive camera for the money. Simply having 10.2 Megapixel resolution and built-in anti-camera-shake is enough to elevate it beyond most budget digital SLRs. Throw in a high resolution 2.5in screen and some neat image processing options along with a kit lens which zooms-in further than the competition, and it’s looking even stronger.”
Website: CameraLabs - Sony A100 Review
Website: Read our Sony A100 Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 Review
Canon IXUS 240 HS Review
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS Review
Nikon D800 Review
Samsung DV300F Review
Nikon Coolpix P510
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ30
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
Fujifilm X-Pro1
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
#1 nick in japan
Good review, the verdict kinda said it all, looking foward to Panasonic's new entry, soon, real soon!
10:08 pm - Monday, July 17, 2006
#2 Zoltan
"To be fair, most of our images appeared dust-free, but a handful definitely had one or more visible marks. As such, Sony's anti-dust system appears less effective than the one from Olympus."
Bugger. I considered buying one for my father, who seems to be really into this camera. He has a couple of Minolta lenses and a system flash waiting to go digital. But come on, the Alpha 100 has dust marks after just a few days/weeks of testing? That means the Sony anti-dust solution is nothing but a marketing bluff. I, for one, expected much more. Have had my E-1 for 17 months and never needed to clean the sensor! Expected the Alpha 100 to be at least as effective.
11:42 am - Wednesday, July 19, 2006
#3 nick in japan
I too had hope for this camera, but shortcomings in the image processing appears to have taken a step backward from Nikon, and, even, Minolta!
I'm a bit confused about the "dust" eval, like, did they intentionally inject dust into the camera to evaluate the anti-dust system? sounds a bit screwy to me.
12:08 pm - Wednesday, July 19, 2006