Canon PowerShot S100 Photos

November 22, 2011 | Mark Goldstein | 5 Comments | |
Canon PowerShot S100 Photos Image

Ahead of our full review, here are 59 sample JPEG photos and a full HD 1080p movie taken with the new Canon PowerShot S100 compact camera.

The S100 has a 12.1 megapixel CMOS sensor, an ISO range of 80-6400, a 24-120mm lens, built-in GPS and 2.3fps burst shooting.

A gallery of full-size photos and a 1080p video taken with the Canon PowerShot S100.

Canon PowerShot S100 JPEG Images

Canon PowerShot S100 Movie

This is a sample movie at the quality setting of 1920x1080 at 30 frames per second. Please note that this 15 second movie is 64.7Mb in size.

Entry Tags

hd video,samples,photos,compact,1080p,preview,movie,12 megapixel,video,5x zoom,compact camera,1920x1080,cmos,Canon,Canon PowerShot S100,PowerShot S100,Canon S100

Tracker Pixel for Entry

Your Comments

5 Comments | Newest Oldest First | Post a Comment

#1 Mad Hungarian

Would it be too much to ask to have the images rotated before posting them?

10:43 pm - Tuesday, November 22, 2011

#2 Dave Quail

Pretty good, but I still prefer the images from the S95

9:52 am - Wednesday, November 23, 2011

#3 Jos

mmm, images are soft and lots of distortion (fuzziness) in the corners of some images, edges in macro photos are very jagged (over aggressive NR maybe?). overall I’m not that impressed, good (especially at higher iso’s but otherwise not wow).

10:44 am - Wednesday, November 23, 2011

#4 Mark

There is fuzziness, but mostly it is the London-fuzzines. You canĀ“t zoom in on a fogy day without getting fuziness.
I am suprised in a positive way, these are the best s100-pics I have seen up to now. Considering the tester did nothing to get the best out of the cam!
As a s95-user I can say that I never took JPG without seting sharpening to +1 and very often I set EV to -0,33. Here I would like to see some pics with NR at min.level and may be colour with +1. Most likely this would give a kick to these pics.
The S100 seems to have a very conservative approach, like most canons before! Good for postprocessing, not so good if you only use defaults.

12:01 pm - Wednesday, November 23, 2011

#5 Andy

Nothing to write home about really, not significantly better than a compact like the Ixus 220 HS and a lot worse than a DSLR like a EOS 550d.(I own both)

1:23 pm - Wednesday, November 23, 2011