Leica T Sample Images

May 7, 2014 | Mark Goldstein | 14 Comments | |
Leica T Sample Images Image

Ahead of our full review, here are 89 full-size sample images and a 1080p movie taken with a full production version of the new Leica T compact system camera and the Vario-Elmar-T 18-56 mm f/3.5–5.6 lens, including the entire ISO range of 100-12500.

The Leica T is a premium mirrorless camera with a 16 megapixel sensor and a massive touchscreen display.

A gallery of 89 sample images taken with the Leica T camera.

Leica T JPEG Images

Sample Movie

This is a sample movie at the highest quality setting of 1920x1080 pixels at 30 frames per second. Please note that this 28 second movie is 52.8Mb in size.

Entry Tags

hd video,hd,1080p,compact system camera,16 megapixel,mirrorless,wi-fi,csc,wireless,wifi,touch-screen,touch screen,touchscreen,touch,leica,leica t,leica t review

Tracker Pixel for Entry

Your Comments

14 Comments | Newest Oldest First | Post a Comment

#1 dan

The high ISO quality did not seen too impressive, and although it doesn’t look bad, it does look very slippy!

2:05 pm - Thursday, April 24, 2014

#2 dan

Also the photo of 3 people next to the window, that a lot of purple fringing going on!

2:07 pm - Thursday, April 24, 2014

#3 Dannybouy

^ It’s very overexposed so not surprising there’s a lot of CA.

8:57 pm - Thursday, April 24, 2014

#4 hdvhdv

Sony NEX-3N made of aluminum sold for 5 times the price, only Leica.

So no need to look at the camera’s images, the sensor is from the Sony NEX.

10:20 pm - Thursday, April 24, 2014

#5 dan

I do think it’s a good looking camera in black, but not really that nice unpainted.
It’s a interesting design and considering how stuck in the past Leica is it’s nice to see them trying something new.

I am not that impressed with the image quality, it’s good, but I expected more.

My main problem is not the price of the body but of the lenses, if Sigma released their wonderful DN lenses for this mount I would be more open to the idea of buying one. 

2:05 pm - Wednesday, May 7, 2014

#6 Yaj

DNGs please, pretty please.


Lenses kind of matter too.

4:40 pm - Wednesday, May 7, 2014

#7 jake

honestly for the price asked, I have to say these images are sadly lousy, not any better than cheap Sony NEX5n from 5 years back.

6:05 pm - Wednesday, May 7, 2014

#8 jake

honestly, these images are not impressive , to say the least.. they are not any better than images from cheap NEX5n. for the price asked we expect more than this.

6:07 pm - Wednesday, May 7, 2014

#9 Jean Pierre

Oh, Leica, what is that? The image quality is not bettern then other manufacturer!!!

I cannot understand why Leica not have done a better job!!!

It is disapointed and I do not think that people will be happy with the Leica T.

Sorry Leica! Please give us a fullframe mirrorless with very good lenses! With that you will have the WOW-Effect back!

7:54 pm - Wednesday, May 7, 2014

#10 Yaj

Jean Pierre:

Leica shipped and still ships a FF mirrorless body.

The first was called the M9 the second the M240.

As for image quality from the T, why go with jpegs from a camera that shoots DNG? You can only make legitimate statements about the jpeg engine.

9:45 pm - Wednesday, May 7, 2014

#11 Jim

There is dust on the sensor and a nasty smudge which is clearly visible in some of the photos. (Worst one being 14th down centre column in the sky) A lot of people must have been messing around with this camera before you got it and not handled it with much care. Certainly not as much care as anyone crazy enough to buy one would! ;)

9:52 pm - Wednesday, May 7, 2014

#12 dan

Whats interesting is the amount of comments this has generated.

10:35 pm - Wednesday, May 7, 2014

#13 Hans Benndorf

I don’t know what the point is to produce only jpeg images for judgement. Who on earth would use this camera and not shoot DNG’s? That’s where the full potential of this camera lies. Judging the image quality from these jpegs is a bit stupid.

10:58 am - Saturday, May 10, 2014

#14 Steven

At 100% these photos are horrible.
They are all smeared with excessive noise reduction and jpeg artifacts.
Quite poor actually.
I would like to see some pics with that terrible noise reduction turned off.

8:44 am - Sunday, September 28, 2014