#1 Reenee Tan

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the review. Surely given its price and size, the Fuji XP10 should be listed as one of the WP10’s main (if not ‘the’) rivals?

10:35 am - Wednesday, September 29, 2010

#2 Hristo

How come this camera got 3.5 for picture quality, just as much as Panasonic FT2, when there is a lot more noise and the image is not sharp at all?

7:50 am - Thursday, September 30, 2010

#3 Zigster

Nice review, thanks.  Actually, I’m kind of surprised, the ISO 800 shot of the sconce isn’t too bad at full resolution, a little noisy but I’ve seen a lot worse. 

Seems like a pretty good deal for the money, although surely something that is waterproof should have faster reaction times, as people will want to take quick snapshots while splashing in the surf, etc.

4:45 pm - Thursday, September 30, 2010

#4 hannah

I purchased the WP-10 three days ago, and couldn’t be happier. I got it for the amazing price of $140 at Target.
There are a few things i do not agree with on the review, eg. the battery life is fantastic. i took this out with me swimming, not even fully charged and managed to get 6 hours out of it and over 250 shots. impressive, i though considering it was on two bars for battery life. Also, I have a Canon G10 and comparative picture quality, for an $800 camera and a $140 camera, the pictures from my wp10 are phenomenal. you just need to know how to use it properly…

10:30 am - Saturday, February 12, 2011