Olympus XZ-10 Review

May 7, 2013 | Mark Goldstein |

Your Comments

7 Comments | Newest Oldest First | Post a Comment

#1 Artur

Please post some useful real world RAW samples. In the last few reviews these RAW samples are useless, same scene indoors.

11:30 pm - Wednesday, May 8, 2013

#2 gut licht

ther are some errors: the xz-10 has no AF at all, no normal macro mode and no auto panorama in camera.

12:09 pm - Friday, May 10, 2013

#3 gut licht

correction: there is no MF

1:10 pm - Friday, May 10, 2013

#4 Laurent

Fully agree with this review.
Always had Canon before (SX-240 last), forgot them in 48h since I bought the ZX-10.
This one is much better almost everywhere, besides the length of zoom of course.
1.8 is so much interesting by far!
Controls much more ergonomic too.
All good, like a mini DSLR, always in my pocket since.

12:11 pm - Thursday, May 16, 2013

#5 Csaba

Nice review.
And what about a comparison between the XZ-10 and the XZ-1 models?

5:48 am - Sunday, September 22, 2013

#6 Eric

Wow! I’ve never seen such low-noise ISO 100 pictures from a 1/2.3 sensor. These pictures look better than from some 1/1.7 sensor cameras. Image quality should have been 5 stars in this review.

11:55 pm - Sunday, October 27, 2013

#7 Richard Ho

Bought this camera 2 months ago. Excellent pictures and built quality. Better than all my compact cameras. Love this camera.

1:02 am - Sunday, December 29, 2013

Entry Tags

hd, 3 inch LCD, compact, review, 1080p, 12 megapixel, hdmi, 5x zoom, manual, touch-screen, RAW, olympus, touch screen, touch, 3 inch, 5x, LCD, 5x lens, Olympus XZ-10, xz10, xz-10, d video, Olympus XZ-10 Review, xz 10

Tracker Pixel for Entry