Pentax K-m Review
                  (also known as the Pentax K2000)
                  Review Date: December 1st 2008
                  Author: Mark Goldstein
Leave a comment about this Review
  | 
                    
Design
![]()  | 
                    
Front of the Camera  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Front of the Camera / Lens Cap Removed  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Front of the Camera / Flash Raised  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Front of the Camera / Lens Removed  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Front of the Camera / Lens Removed  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Isometric View  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Isometric View  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Rear of the Camera  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Rear of the Camera / Settings Screen  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Rear of the Camera / Image Displayed  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Rear of the Camera / Main Menu  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Rear of the Camera / Help Screen  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Top of the Camera  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Bottom of the Camera  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Side of the Camera  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Side of the Camera  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Front of the Camera  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Front of the Camera  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Battery Compartment  | 
                    
![]()  | 
                    
Memory Card Slot  | 
                    
  | 
                    
 
PhotographyBLOG 
                    is a member of the DIWA 
                    organisation. Our test results for the Pentax K-m have 
                    been submitted to DIWA 
                    for comparison with test results for different samples of 
                    the same camera model supplied by other DIWA 
                    member sites.
						


















